Blame
| b5b2e4 | Melisha Dsouza | 2026-04-09 07:50:00 | 1 | # **Low-Level Design (LLD) Template** |
| 2 | ||||
| ab13bb | Melisha Dsouza | 2026-04-09 07:56:46 | 3 | **Document Revision History** |
| 4 | ||||
| 5 | | Ver No | Date | Change Information | Author | Approver | |
|||
| 6 | |--------|------|--------------------|--------|----------| |
|||
| 7 | | V1.0 | Date | Initial Draft | Author Name | Approver Name | |
|||
| 8 | ||||
| 9 | ||||
| b5b2e4 | Melisha Dsouza | 2026-04-09 07:50:00 | 10 | ### **1. Problem Statement** |
| 11 | ||||
| 12 | - Clearly describe the problem in 2–3 lines |
|||
| 13 | - Mention what needs to be achieved and why |
|||
| 14 | ||||
| 15 | **Example:** |
|||
| 16 | ||||
| 17 | Admin dashboard should display the count of pending transfers so that operations team can monitor incomplete transactions and take timely action. |
|||
| 18 | ||||
| 19 | ### **2. Scope** |
|||
| 20 | - What is included |
|||
| 21 | - What is excluded (if any) |
|||
| 22 | ||||
| 23 | ### **3. Solution Approach (Technical Design)** |
|||
| 24 | #### **3.1 Overview** |
|||
| 25 | - High-level explanation of the solution |
|||
| 26 | - **Mention whether:** |
|||
| 27 | - Existing services will be reused |
|||
| 28 | - New services/APIs will be created |
|||
| 29 | - Existing services will be enhanced |
|||
| 30 | ||||
| 31 | #### **3.2 Components / Modules Involved** |
|||
| 32 | - **List all impacted modules:** |
|||
| 33 | - Backend services |
|||
| 34 | - Frontend/UI |
|||
| 35 | - Database |
|||
| 36 | - External integrations (if any) |
|||
| 37 | ||||
| 38 | #### **3.3 API Design** |
|||
| 39 | - **For each API:** |
|||
| 40 | - **API Name:** |
|||
| 41 | - **Method**: (GET/POST/PUT/DELETE) |
|||
| 42 | - **Endpoint:** |
|||
| 43 | - **Request**: |
|||
| 44 | - **Response**: |
|||
| 45 | - **Auth Required:** Yes/No |
|||
| 46 | - **Service Handling It:** |
|||
| 47 | ||||
| 48 | #### **3.4 Data Flow** |
|||
| 49 | - Step-by-step flow of how data moves across systems |
|||
| 50 | - **Mention**: |
|||
| 51 | - Source of data |
|||
| 52 | - Processing logic |
|||
| 53 | - Final output |
|||
| 54 | ||||
| 55 | #### **3.5 Database Impact** |
|||
| 56 | - New tables (if any) |
|||
| 57 | - Changes in existing tables |
|||
| 58 | - New fields/columns |
|||
| 59 | - Indexing (if needed) |
|||
| 60 | - Query changes |
|||
| 61 | ||||
| 62 | #### **3.6 Business Logic** |
|||
| 63 | - Core logic/conditions |
|||
| 64 | - Rules to calculate/derive values |
|||
| 65 | ||||
| 66 | **Example:** |
|||
| 67 | ||||
| 68 | Pending transfer = transactions where status IN (initiated, processing, on-hold) |
|||
| 69 | ||||
| 70 | #### **3.7 Service Design** |
|||
| 71 | - Number of services impacted/added |
|||
| 72 | - **Description of each:** |
|||
| 73 | - New service |
|||
| 74 | - Modified service |
|||
| 75 | - Reusable service |
|||
| 76 | ||||
| 77 | #### **3.8 Error Handling** |
|||
| 78 | - Failure scenarios |
|||
| 79 | - Retry mechanisms |
|||
| 80 | - Logging strategy |
|||
| 81 | - User-facing error messages |
|||
| 82 | ||||
| 83 | #### **3.9 Edge Cases** |
|||
| 84 | - List all possible edge cases |
|||
| 85 | **Example:** |
|||
| 86 | - Transfer stuck due to insufficient liquidity |
|||
| 87 | - Partial transaction completion |
|||
| 88 | - Duplicate requests |
|||
| 89 | ||||
| 90 | #### **3.10 Performance Considerations** |
|||
| 91 | - Query optimization |
|||
| 92 | - Caching (if required) |
|||
| 93 | - Pagination / batching |
|||
| 94 | - Expected load |
|||
| 95 | ||||
| 96 | #### **3.11 Security Considerations** |
|||
| 97 | - Authentication / Authorization |
|||
| 98 | - Data masking (if applicable) |
|||
| 99 | - Sensitive data handling |
|||
| 100 | ||||
| 101 | ### **4. Sequence Diagram** |
|||
| 102 | - Visual flow of request → processing → response |
|||
| ab13bb | Melisha Dsouza | 2026-04-09 07:56:46 | 103 | - **Must include:** |
| b5b2e4 | Melisha Dsouza | 2026-04-09 07:50:00 | 104 | - UI |
| 105 | - Backend service(s) |
|||
| 106 | - DB |
|||
| 107 | - External systems (if any) |
|||
| 108 | ||||
| 109 | ### **5. Unit Test Criteria** |
|||
| 110 | - Define test scenarios: |
|||
| 111 | **Example:** |
|||
| 112 | - Valid pending transfers count |
|||
| 113 | - No data scenario |
|||
| 114 | - Error response handling |
|||
| 115 | - Edge case validation |
|||
| 116 | ||||
| 117 | ### **6. Integration / QA Test Scenarios** |
|||
| 118 | - End-to-end scenarios |
|||
| 119 | - APIUI validation |
|||
| 120 | ||||
| 121 | ### **7. Dependencies** |
|||
| 122 | - External services |
|||
| 123 | - Other modules |
|||
| 124 | - Data availability |
|||
| 125 | ||||
| 126 | ### **8. Assumptions** |
|||
| 127 | - Any assumptions made during design |
|||
| 128 | ||||
| 129 | ### **9. Risks & Mitigation** |
|||
| 130 | - Potential risks |
|||
| 131 | - How to handle them |
|||
| 132 | ||||
| 133 | ### **10. Deployment / Rollout Plan** |
|||
| 134 | - Any migration required |
|||
| 135 | - Backward compatibility |
|||
| 136 | - Feature flag (if needed) |
|||
| 137 | ||||
| 138 | ### **11. Open Questions** |
|||
| 139 | - Any pending clarifications |